Court rebukes NSA over surveillance of U.S. citizens
A federal judge on Monday ruled that the government's collection of data on all U.S. phone calls is likely unconstitutional, comparing the National Security Agency (NSA) program to George Orwell's Jewel v. NSA | Electronic Frontier Foundation In Jewel v. NSA, EFF is suing the NSA and other government agencies on behalf of AT&T customers to stop the illegal unconstitutional and ongoing dragnet surveillance of their communications and communications records. Filed in 2008, Jewel v. US Court Rules NSA Phone surveillance Program is illegal
Supreme Court refusal to block NSA data collection not surprising With two cases pending in lower courts, justices probably wanted to defer decisions to them By Jaikumar Vijayan
The NSA Phone surveillance program, first disclosed by the former NSA employee and whistleblower of global surveillance Edward Snowden, ruled illegal by a New York federal appeals court on Thursday, ordering lawmakers to either completely end or replace the program. ACLU v. NSA - Opposition | OSG | Department of Justice
Michigan Courts - One Court of Justice
Oct 09, 2019 NSA Spying on Americans Is Illegal | American Civil Ignoring those controls and wiretapping without a court order is a crime that carries a significant prison sentence (in fact, criminal violations of the wiretap statute were among the articles of impeachment that were drafted against President Nixon shortly before his resignation). Michigan Courts - One Court of Justice The Michigan Supreme Court is providing the information on this site as a public service. The information is updated frequently based upon the needs of our users. Although every effort is made to maintain accurate information on this site, the Michigan Supreme Court does not … Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Courts | Mises Institute In the preliminary ruling in December, the US District Court for the District of Columbia found that the NSA’s mass collection of metadata, as shown in its own leaked documents, “most likely” violates the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution.